Image - 25 October 2019

Royal Courts of Justice, London, United Kingdom. Credit: Ms Jane Campbell / Shutterstock.com

Adam Ramshaw, Senior Lecturer in Law at Northumbria University, discusses why a written constitution for the UK would not have resolved recent Brexit arguments.

License:: Media Use
The content may be downloaded by journalists, bloggers, columnists, creators of public opinion, etc. It can be used and shared in different media channels to convey, narrate, and comment on your press releases, posts, or information, provided that the content is unmodified. The author or creator shall be attributed to the extent and in the manner required by good practice (this means, for example, that photographers should be attributed).
By:: Ms Jane Campbell / Shutterstock.com
File format:: .jpg
Size:: 3000 x 2000, 820 KB

Download

Topics

Contacts

Rik Kendall

Press contact PR and Media Manager Business and Law / Arts, Design & Social Sciences rik.kendall@northumbria.ac.uk 07923 382339

Andrea Slowey

Press contact PR and Media Manager Engineering and Environment / Health and Life Sciences andrea.slowey@northumbria.ac.uk 07708 509436

Rachael Barwick

Press contact PR and Media Manager rachael.barwick@northumbria.ac.uk 07377422415

James Fox

Press contact Student Communications Manager james2.fox@northumbria.ac.uk

Kelly Elliott

Press contact PR and Media Officer kelly2.elliott@northumbria.ac.uk

Gemma Brown

Press contact PR and Media Officer gemma6.brown@northumbria.ac.uk

Expert comment: A written constitution for the UK would not have resolved recent Brexit arguments – here’s why

Adam Ramshaw, Senior Lecturer in Law at Northumbria University, Newcastle, discusses why a written constitution for the UK would not have resolved recent Brexit arguments.